Richard Stone is offering you to have website «Politics» remembered
Do you want us to remember the «Politics» website?
Yes No
×
Прогноз погоды

“Time and the world do not stand still. Change is the law of life.” John F.Kennedy

Democrats divided on their path to 2016

expand

Democrats divided on their path to 2016

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

In the six weeks since their repudiation in the midterms, Democrats have seen the opening of fissures within their once-disciplined ranks, marking the start of an internal struggle between now and the 2016 election over the ideological identity and tactical direction of the party.

The tension — shown in high relief during the messy final days of the congressional session — is in some ways a mirror image of the stresses within the Republican Party, which has been divided between its tea party and establishment factions in recent years.

In the case of both parties, the argument pits the more populist, purist elements of the base against the more pragmatic center.

For Democrats, “it is a conflict that was looking for an occasion,” said William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, who was a policy adviser to former President Bill Clinton. “The election provided the occasion.”

Having lost big in November, two wings within the party have been trading recriminations over which was more to blame while jostling for position to be the face of the Democrats going into 2016.

 

They are personified by former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, the presumptive presidential front-runner by virtue of her stature and fame, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, the anti-Wall Street clarion favored by many on the left to challenge Clinton for the Democratic nomination.

If the loss of the Senate intensified strains within the party, the $1.1 trillion spending bill that passed Saturday night raised two issues that acted as matches to gasoline. One was a provision rolling back portions of the 2010 financial regulatory law known as the Dodd-Frank Act. The other loosened campaign donation limits, allowing the wealthy to give three times the current maximum to the national political parties. That means even more clout for rich donors and the interests they represent.

In both instances, the question was not whether Democrats supported the individual provisions — they generally do not. It was whether individual members considered them so egregious as to merit blowing up a wide-ranging deal to which Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) had been a party and for which President Obama was personally lobbying.

 

“What we saw over the last couple of days is an example of a debate that is probably going to go on for a while in the party,” said Jim Manley, a Democratic strategist and former aide to Reid.

Proponents of the legislation argued that they had succeeded in preventing even more provisions weakening Dodd-Frank from being inserted in the bill. And at any rate, they said, the legislation was far better than anything Democrats could expect should they allow the debate to continue into next year, when Republicans will be in control of the House and Senate.

But Warren urged her colleagues to hold the line, particularly against the banks whose political influence she accused her own party of abetting.

“Enough is enough with Wall Street insiders getting key position after key position and the kind of cronyism we have seen in the executive branch,” she said in a fiery speech on the Senate floor. “Enough is enough with Citigroup passing eleventh-hour deregulatory provisions that nobody takes ownership over but that everybody comes to regret. Enough is enough.”

 

So strident was her opposition that it drew comparison with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.), who had led the charge against the bill from the right based on opposition to Obama’s immigration policies.

Democratic leaders denied any symmetry.

“Elizabeth Warren, even if people don’t agree with her, she’s constructive. She’s not like Ted Cruz,” Sen. Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.) said Sunday on CNN. “She’s working hard to move things in her direction. And that’s a good thing.”

On the House side, there also was a Democratic schism. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) marshaled opposition to the spending bill, while her second-in-command, Democratic whip Steny H. Hoyer (Md.), voted for it.

As the drama was playing out on Capitol Hill on Friday, more than 300 former Obama campaign staff members released a letter calling on Warren to run, saying, “we want someone who will stand up for working families and take on the Wall Street banks and special interests that took down our economy.” Last week, the liberal group Moveon.org also announced that it would put at least $1 million into an effort to draft Warren, who has repeatedly said she does not intend to run for president and who was recently named to a spot in the Senate Democratic leadership.

Neither statement mentioned Clinton, who many on the left think is too sympathetic to Wall Street and corporate interests. She has yet to make clear what her main rationale for running would be if she decides to seek the presidency.

“I don’t think anyone is dying to have a primary so much as we are to have the right issues debated in this presidential election and beyond,” said Steve Hildebrand, who was Obama’s 2008 deputy campaign manager. Hildebrand said he has not committed to any candidate.

Democrats who opposed the spending bill claimed a moral victory, with Pelosi writing in a letter to her rank-and-file members that their resistance had “strengthened our position.”

Some said it also framed the terms of political engagement going forward.

“I think the overarching narrative that is most powerful right now is that everyday citizens are being left out — almost locked out — of their own democracy, when you look at Washington, when you look at the influence that special interests have,” said Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md.). “Democrats want to find a way to give people their voice back.”

It may be that the current struggle will nudge the party further to the left and help it coalesce around a message. Or the episode may have underscored the dysfunction of an era of intense polarization, where meeting in the middle has become all but impossible — even within a single political party.

As retiring Rep. James P. Moran (D-Va.) exited a marathon meeting of his caucus over the spending measure, he reflected on what will be one of his final experiences in two dozen years on Capitol Hill.

“I think that this particular experience, as many others, has validated my decision to leave,” he said.

.

 

Source


Published by , 15.12.2014 at 12:44
Статистика 1
Показы: 1 Охват: 0 Прочтений: 0

Comments

To show the previous comments (%s from %s)
Mary Cochran
Mary Cochran 15 December 14 15:31 Oh, it's the bad trend. They make their electorate to choose between them... Text hided expand
0
Zoltan Brenner
Zoltan Brenner 15 December 14 15:40 The Republicans just made their first move that will end up alienating the American people and bring the Democrats back in power. Text hided expand
0
Amberlynn
Amberlynn 15 December 14 16:20 This was expected because their programs were quite different. But this will lead to the lower rate of support among electorate. Text hided expand
0
Show new comments
All comments are shown: 3
Facebook comments
Like

Site search

Last comments

Mehmet Göktaş
thank you..
Mehmet Göktaş Kelly Thinks He’s Saving the U.S. from Disaster
Robert Hall
Maybe DeSantis just gave Mueller reason to add him to the list of people being investigated.
Robert Hall GOP Lawmaker Floats Measure to Stop Mueller Probe
ngangawasom
Trump is Heartless
ngangawasom Trump Confirms He Called Health Bill ‘Mean’
Ivan Pravda
Mr. McCain, is having a terrible mental disfunction in his brain thats called "Russofobia" . I thin…
Ivan Pravda McCain Says Dictators Start By Attacking Press
Ivan Pravda
That stupid aggressive American had to keep his mouth shut or get an heart attack. That should be b…
Ivan Pravda McCain Says Mexico Won’t Pay for Border Wall
George Welch
Cut off their funds and dry up some of their freebies which will also dry up their votes.
George Welch Big City Mayors Will Defy Trump Order on Sanctuary Cities
Dan Hughes
So sad. All the money in the world and not enough knowledge to spend it in the right places. Hi…
Dan Hughes How Analytics Failed Clinton
Ser korz
Liberty Blitzkrieg Included on Washington Post Highlighted Hit List of “Russian Propaganda” Website…
Ser korz Russia Seen Behind Surge of ‘Fake News’
Warren Pugh
Do she and the current president work for a living?
Warren Pugh Clinton Would Bring Different Style to White House
Haggai Seraiah
Please vote for Trump and that's the only way you will the changes at your level. They are fighting…
Haggai Seraiah Trump Maintains Wide Lead Nationally